Posts

Key Populations and the Global Fund: Delivering Key Results

Key Populations and the Global Fund: Delivering Key Results explains why ending AIDS, TB and malaria will be impossible without addressing the needs of and working with key and vulnerable populations. It details the unique role the Global Fund has played to support and mobilize domestic resources for key populations, challenge human rights barriers to health and provide opportunities for these populations to participate in the development and implementation of programmes that affect them.

Read more

Global Fund Replenishment 2016: The Cost of Inaction

Global Fund Replenishment 2016: The Cost of Inaction demonstrates that inadequate investment in the Global Fund will threaten millions of lives and result in billions of dollars in additional costs. According to the report, failure to fully fund the global responses for AIDS, TB and malaria, including replenishing the Global Fund, over the next six years, will:

  • Result in 21 million preventable AIDS deaths and 28 million preventable new HIV infections;
  • Give rise to 45 million new TB infections and an additional 29 million people needing treatment;
  • Jeopardize the potential to avert 3 million malaria cases and save 10 million lives.

Additionally, the Cost of Inaction report describes how simply maintaining current levels of investment could result in a rise of drug-resistant strains of HIV, TB and malaria that are even more costly to treat. For example, the number of people with HIV who will require more expensive second-line treatments – usually as a result of drug resistance – is estimated to double between 2014 and 2020.

GFAN & FSP launch urgent financing & key population reports at AIDS 2016

DURBAN, South Africa, 20 July 2016 – Fully replenishing the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis (TB) and Malaria is essential for delivering on the promises to end the HIV/AIDS epidemic made in the Sustainable Development Goals and the UN Declaration on Ending AIDS. While fully replenishing the Fund would save millions of lives, failure to do so would unravel years of progress and jeopardize effective programmes for reaching key and vulnerable populations at greatest risk for HIV.

Read more